DPF Framework 26r1: proposal of introductory sentences to sections an…#309
Merged
DPF Framework 26r1: proposal of introductory sentences to sections an…#309
Conversation
…d new column in Input table and alternate text for Required label
Contributor
|
@AnsMelanie I've taken the changes proposed for the operator and made this PR at the template level: |
PProfizi
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@PProfizi
This proposal introduces revised introductory sentences for several sections, a new column in the Input table, and alternative text for the Required label in an operator specification example. I recommend applying these updates to the template so they will automatically apply to all operators. I have also added an introductory sentence to the Operator specification page.